Liminalitas Pembelajaran Seni Budaya yang Berkelanjutan Dalam Era Digital Native
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v5i1.896Keywords:
liminality, the art and culture learning process, continuing education, technology, the native digital eraAbstract
The development of technology in the digital native era causes the need for adaptation of education, one of which is cultural arts education. It is intended that the art and culture learning process can collaborate and negotiate with native digital technology to improve practical and theoretical skills in the global canon. Therefore, it is necessary to study the limitations of the art and culture learning process in the digital native era. This study also discusses and analyzes the responses of teachers, students, and parents as an ecosystem for the art and culture learning process within the limitations that occur. This research uses a mixed-methods with an interdisciplinary approach to explore educational perspectives, learning methods, technology, which is combined with the liminality conditions of the art and culture learning process in the digital native era. Collecting data using literature and documentation studies, and questionnaires via google form. The spatial boundaries of the research included 10 elementary schools, 10 junior high schools, and 10 high schools in Surabaya, East Java, which were randomly selected. The results showed that (1) the art and culture learning process by utilizing digital native technology has the potential to become sustainable education; (2) provide creative challenges for teachers in delivery, as well as for students in its use; and (3) liminality that occurs in the art and culture learning process occurs in an effort to balance and negotiate between classical and modern learning, practical models and theories, as well as between the orientation of the end result and the orientation of sustainable process outcomes.
Downloads
References
(ACRL), Association of College and Research Libraries. “ACRL Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education,” 2011. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy.
Black, Joanna, and Kathy Browning. “Creativity in Digital Art Education Teaching Practices.” Art Education 64, no. 5 (2011): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2011.11519140.
Bowen, Daniel H., Jay P. Greene, and Brian Kisida. “Learning to Think Critically: A Visual Art Experiment.” Educational Researcher 43, no. 1 (2014): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512675.
Cannon, Michelle. Digital Media in Education: Teaching, Learning and Literacy Practices with Young Learners. London: The Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78304-8.
Charman, Steve, and Brian Cahill. “Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1, no. 220020483 (2012): 171–78.
Choi, Haeryun, and Joseph M. Piro. “Expanding Arts Education in a Digital Age.” Arts Education Policy Review 110, no. 3 (2009): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.110.3.27-34.
Colman, Alison. “Net.Art and Net.Pedagogy?: Introducing Internet Art to the Digital Art Curriculum.” Studies in Art Education 46, no. Technology Issue (2018): 61–73.
Cook-Sather, Alison, and Zanny Alter. “What Is and What Can Be: How a Liminal Position Can Change Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 42, no. 1 (2011): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x.
Creswell, John W. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Fifth Edit. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x.
Dussel, Inés, and Karin Priem. “The Visual in Histories of Education: A Reappraisal.” Paedagogica Historica 53, no. 6 (2017): 641–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1392582.
Gao, Shiming, and Chih ming Wang. “Crisis of the Human and the Responsibilities of Art/Education.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 20, no. 1 (2019): 140–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2019.1577586.
Gehlbach, Roger D. “Art Education: Issues in Curriculum and Research.” Educational Researcher 19, no. 7 (1990): 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019007019.
Ghavifekr, Simin, and Wan Athirah Wan Rosdy. “Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools.” International Journal of Research in Education and Science 1, no. 2 (2015): 175–91. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596.
Gomis-Porqueras, Pedro, and José A. Rodrigues-Neto. “Teaching Technologies, Attendance, Learning and the Optimal Level of Access to Online Materials.” Economic Modelling 73, no. May 2017 (2018): 329–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.04.009.
Grierson, Elizabeth. “Art and Creativity in the Global Economies of Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43, no. 4 (2011): 336–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00550.x.
Gude, Olivia. “New School Art Styles: The Project of Art Education.” Art Education 66, no. November 2017 (2013): 1–15.
Gunn, Vicky. “Attentive Outrage and Fine Art Higher Education: A Manifesto of the Liminal.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 19, no. 1 (2020): 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1723278.
Henriksen, Danah, Punya Mishra, and Petra Fisser. “International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Infusing Creativity and Technology in 21st Century Education?: A Systemic View for Change Published by?: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Infusing Creativity and Technology In.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19, no. 3 (2016): 27–37.
Herawati, dan Iriaji. Pendidikan Seni Rupa. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1998.
Hicks, Laurie ?. “Art Education?: Thing or Device.” Studies in Art Education 54, no. 2 (2019): 99–102.
Hicks, Troy, and Kristen Hawley Turner. “No Longer a Luxury: Digital Literacy Can’t Wait.” The English Journal 102, no. 6 (2013): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957403.n296.
Hudson, Tipton D. “Conversation as an Education Medium for the Age of Distraction - the ‘Art of Range’ Podcast.” Rangelands 42, no. 1 (2020): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2020.01.005.
Kearns, Lorna R. “The Experience of Teaching Online and Its Impact on Faculty Innovation across Delivery Methods.” Internet and Higher Education 31 (2016): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.005.
Kidi, Norman, Bayu Kanigoro, Afan Galih Salman, Yen Lina Prasetio, Indrabudhi Lokaadinugroho, and Arief Agus Sukmandhani. “Android Based Indonesian Information Culture Education Game.” Procedia Computer Science 116 (2017): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.015.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 2012.
Leavy, Particia. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press, 2017.
Lee, Kyungmee. “Rethinking the Accessibility of Online Higher Education: A Historical Review.” Internet and Higher Education 33 (2017): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001.
Lin, Tzu-Bin, Victor Chen, and Ching Sing Chai, eds. New Media and Learning in the 21st Century; A Social-Cultural Perspektive. Singapore: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-326-2.
Lindberg, Susanna. “Politics of Digital Learning—Thinking Education with Bernard Stiegler.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52, no. 4 (2020): 384–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1586531.
Lune, Howard, and Bruce L. Berg. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Ninth edit. Essex: Pearson, 2017.
Malchiodi, Cathy A., ed. Handbook of Art Therapy. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.9.1294-a.
Maney, J. Kevin. “The Role of Technology in Education.” Handbook of Educational Policy, no. January (1999): 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012174698-8/50043-6.
Martin, Allan. Digital Literacy and the Digital Society. Dutch: Die Deutsche Bibliothek, 2008.
McClure, Marissa, Patricia Tarr, Christine Marmé Thompson, and Angela Eckhoff. “Defining Quality in Visual Art Education for Young Children: Building on the Position Statement of the Early Childhood Art Educators.” Arts Education Policy Review 118, no. 3 (2017): 154–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2016.1245167.
Mills, Kathy Ann. “A Review of the " Digital Turn " in the New Literacy Studies.” Review of Educational Research 80, no. 2 (2016): 246–71.
Moran, Joe. Interdisciplinarity. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Morris, Christine Ballengee. “Art Education in Transition.” Art Education 64, no. 5 (2011): 7–9.
Msila, Vuyisile, and Angeline Setlhako. “Teaching (Still) Matters: Experiences on Developing a Heutagogical Online Module at UNISA.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69, no. Iceepsy 2012 (2012): 136–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.392.
Patton, Ryan M., and Melanie L. Buffington. “Keeping up with Our Students: The Evolution of Technology and Standards in Art Education.” Arts Education Policy Review 117, no. 3 (2016): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.944961.
Pianfetti, E.S. “Teachers and Technology: Digital Literacy through Professional Development.” Language Arts 78, no. 255–262 (2001): 255–62.
Quinn, Robert D. “E-Learning in Art Education?: Collaborative Meaning Making Through Digital Art Production.” Art Education 64, no. 4 (2018): 18–24.
Rantatalo, Oscar, and Ola Lindberg. “Liminal Practice and Reflection in Professional Education: Police Education and Medical Education.” Studies in Continuing Education 40, no. 3 (2018): 351–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1447918.
Roland, Craig. “Preparing Art Teachers to Teach in a New Digital Landscape.” Art Education 63, no. 1 (2010): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519049.
Ross, Jen. “Speculative Method in Digital Education Research.” Learning, Media and Technology 42, no. 2 (2017): 214–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1160927.
Sampurno, Muchammad Bayu Tejo. “A Case Study of Therapeutic Process Autistic Children as Performing Art in Indonesia.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 277, no. Steach 2018 (2019): 41–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.9.
Schweizer, C., J. De Bruyn, S. Hayen, B. Henskens, M. Rutten-Saris, and H. Visser, eds. Handbook of Art Therapy: From the Paint. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 2009.
Slota, Margaret, Maureen McLaughlin, Lorena Bradford, Julia F. Langley, and Sarah Vittone. “Visual Intelligence Education as an Innovative Interdisciplinary Approach for Advancing Communication and Collaboration Skills in Nursing Practice.” Journal of Professional Nursing 34, no. 5 (2018): 357–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.12.007.
Spalter, Anne Morgan, and Andries Van Dam. “Digital Visual Literacy.” Theory into Practice 47, no. 2 (2008): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840801992256.
Sudarsana, I. Ketut, Ayu Ratih Nakayanti, Andy Sapta, Haimah, Erwinsyah Satria, Kundharu Saddhono, G. S. Achmad Daengs, Endrayana Putut, Trisna Helda, and M. Mursalin. “Technology Application in Education and Learning Process.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1363, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1363/1/012061.
Sugiarta, Awandi Nopyan. “Pengembangan Model Pengelolaan Program Pembela-Jaran Kolaboratif Untuk Kemandirian Anak Jalanan Di Rumah Singgah (Studi Terfokus Di Rumah Singgak Kota Bekasi).” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2007.
Tashakkori, A, and J Creswell. “Mixed Methodology Across Disciplines.” Journal Of Mixed Methods Research 2, no. 1 (2008): 1–5.
Taylor, Pamela G, and B Stephen Carpenter. “Mediating Art Education?: Digital Kids , Art , and Technology.” Visual Arts Research 33, no. 2 (2016): 84–95.
Tusiime, Wycliff Edwin, Monica Johannesen, and Greta Björk Gudmundsdottir. “Teaching Art and Design in a Digital Age: Challenges Facing Ugandan Teacher Educators.” Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1786439.
Ulusman, Leyla, and Cimen Bayburtlu. “Paradigm for Art Education; Creation Story of Jewels, Theme, Design, Artwork, 3D.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 51 (2012): 284–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.160.
Villamizar, Andres Gabriel. “Examining Intersections between Visual Literacy and Digital Technologies in English Language Programs for Higher Education.” Journal of Visual Literacy 37, no. 4 (2018): 276–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1522089.
Weninger, Csilla. “The ‘Vernacularization’ of Global Education Policy: Media and Digital Literacy as Twenty-First Century Skills in Singapore.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 37, no. 4 (2017): 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1336429.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 NATURALISTIC : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Journal Naturalistic : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (e-ISSN:2548-8589, p-ISSN:2528-2921).
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.
