Optimizing Training Management Through Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) Framework

Catur Supriyanto; Gigih  Siantoro; Aghus Sifaq; Nur Ahmad  Arief; Novadri Ayubi; Made Pramono; Apip Dwi Cahyono; Fitri Fatimah Patmana  Putri

doi:10.35568/abdimas.v8i3.6898

Authors

Catur Supriyanto Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Gigih Siantoro Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Aghus Sifaq Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Nur Ahmad Arief Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Novadri Ayubi Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Made Pramono Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Apip Dwi Cahyono Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia
Fitri Fatimah Patmana Putri Sport Management Department, Faculty of Sport Science and Health, Surabaya State University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35568/abdimas.v8i3.6898

Keywords:

Long-Term Athlete Development, Training Management , Motivation, VO2 Max, Youth Athletes

Abstract

This community development is intended to assess the effectiveness of a 12-week training management approach grounded in the Long-Term Athlete Development (LTAD) framework, executed at the Surabaya Athletes Association. The program aims to improve athletic performance while comprehensively addressing the developmental requirements of student-athletes. Thirty student-athletes, aged 13 to 17 years, engaged in the 12-week intervention. A mixed-method research methodology was utilized to perform a thorough study. Quantitative data were obtained using pre- and post-program physiological evaluations (VO2Max, strength, agility), while qualitative data were collected through surveys assessing motivation and program satisfaction. The quantitative study demonstrated a statistically significant enhancement in participants' VO2Max values (p<0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant average gain of 12% in scores on strength and agility assessments. Over 85% of the participants qualitatively expressed improvement in training motivation and overall program satisfaction. The results robustly endorse the effectiveness of a training approach that methodically combines physical conditioning with academic requirements and mental health factors. This method successfully facilitated physiological and psychological improvements based on the principles of periodization and individualization. The study advocates implementing the LTAD scheme as a foundational framework for the national Indonesian Athletes Association to guarantee sustainable, high-performance athlete development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balyi, I., & Hamilton, A. (2004). Long-term athlete development: The capacity for training during childhood and adolescence. National Coaching Institute.

Buchheit, M., & Laursen, P. B. (2013). Physiological and performance modifications resulting from interval training in adolescents. Sports Medicine, 43(8), 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0044-z

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human necessities and the self-determination of actions. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Faigenbaum, A. D., Stracciolini, A., Best, T. M., & Micheli, L. J. (2009). Adolescent resistance training: Advantages and hazards. American Academy of Pediatrics, 123(6), 1056-1063. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3142

Ford, P., De Ste Croix, M., Lloyd, R., Meyers, R., Moosavi, M., Oliver, J., … Williams, C. (2011). The Long-Term Athlete Development model: Physiological evidence and application. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.536849

Hill, C. M., Smeeton, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2012). Impact of progressive resistance training on adolescent athletes: Consequences for youth sports. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26(10), 2727–2735. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824259cb

Lloyd, R. S., Oliver, J. L., Faigenbaum, A. D., Howard, R., De Ste Croix, M. B. A., Williams, C. A., Best, T. M., Alvar, B. A., Micheli, L. J., Thomas, D. P., Hatfield, D. L., Cronin, J. B., & Myer, G. D. (2015). Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 2: Barriers to Success and Potential Solutions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(5), 1451–1464. https://doi.org/10.1519/01.JSC.0000465424.75389.56

Malina, R. M., Cumming, S. P., & Lenders, N. J. (2004). The significance of physical fitness in youth sports: Consequences for development. Pediatric Exercise Science, 16(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.16.4.345

Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). The influence of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on teenage physical activity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(3), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200108404261

Pichardo, A. W., Oliver, J. L., Harrison, C. B., Maulder, P. S., & Lloyd, R. S. (2018). Integrating models of long-term athletic development to maximize the physical development of youth. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 13(6), 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954118785503

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the enhancement of intrinsic motivation, social growth, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: An assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivational factors in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025.